<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Shack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cornerstoneradio.com/chaplainblog/the-shack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cornerstoneradio.com/chaplainblog/the-shack/</link>
	<description>89.5 KTSY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:50:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pett</title>
		<link>http://cornerstoneradio.com/chaplainblog/the-shack/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Pett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornerstoneradio.com/chaplainblog/?p=26#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Greatings,
cornerstoneradio.com - da best. Keep it going!

Thank you
Pett</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greatings,<br />
cornerstoneradio.com &#8211; da best. Keep it going!</p>
<p>Thank you<br />
Pett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Kidder</title>
		<link>http://cornerstoneradio.com/chaplainblog/the-shack/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kidder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornerstoneradio.com/chaplainblog/?p=26#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Chaplain, I enjoyed your post.  I noticed your comments on open theology and it reminded me of how I used to view it.  You probably have read books and blogs that are against open theology.  I would like to lovingly challenge you to seriously evaluate it through some of its proponents.  The anti-group always seems to miss the main points or maybe purposely misrepresents it.  By honestly looking at different Christian theologies I found that they all have proof texts and problem texts.  Although open theology seems unorthodox to modern western Christians I find that it actually has fewer problem texts than say Calvinism or Arminianism.  
Blessings from a brother in Christ, Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chaplain, I enjoyed your post.  I noticed your comments on open theology and it reminded me of how I used to view it.  You probably have read books and blogs that are against open theology.  I would like to lovingly challenge you to seriously evaluate it through some of its proponents.  The anti-group always seems to miss the main points or maybe purposely misrepresents it.  By honestly looking at different Christian theologies I found that they all have proof texts and problem texts.  Although open theology seems unorthodox to modern western Christians I find that it actually has fewer problem texts than say Calvinism or Arminianism.<br />
Blessings from a brother in Christ, Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa DeRosier</title>
		<link>http://cornerstoneradio.com/chaplainblog/the-shack/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa DeRosier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornerstoneradio.com/chaplainblog/?p=26#comment-76</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU!

I really appreciated the way you described your belief in how to read and interpret the book The Shack.  I have heard so many freak out about this being anti-Christian teachings when really, we all need to chill and take everything with a grain of salt.  I liked your perspective and I appreciate you trying to explain it in laymans terms.  Bless you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU!</p>
<p>I really appreciated the way you described your belief in how to read and interpret the book The Shack.  I have heard so many freak out about this being anti-Christian teachings when really, we all need to chill and take everything with a grain of salt.  I liked your perspective and I appreciate you trying to explain it in laymans terms.  Bless you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
